Frequently Asked Question
Is the expectation that any PFI investigation initiated must result in a PFI Final Report?
Yes, a PFI Final Report is required. The expectation is that the PFI must complete the merchant's PFI Investigation and produce the Final PFI Report, with details of adequate evidence to support claims.
PCI SSC has received multiple inquiries on how to move forward on a third-party service provider case where the breach has been confirmed to have occurred and affected merchants, particularly where some affected merchants may have already begun their own PFI engagements. While there is no "one size fits all" response to such inquiry, PCI SSC can provide the following guidance to PFIs in determining next steps:
- When a PFI investigates a third-party service provider incident, scoping should include steps to identify and include any third-party connections as part of incident validation and assessment, including affected merchants and their sponsoring acquirers.
- In the example of a merchant for which a PFI has already completed the PFI Preliminary Incident Response Report and delivered it to each affected Participating Payment Brand before evidence that a third-party service provider was in fact responsible for the breach affecting the merchant is produced, PFIs are expected to fully complete a Final PFI Report for the merchant. The PFI is expected to complete the merchant investigation and provide confirmation and document in the final PFI report that the breach is related to the third-party service provider incident. It would be reasonable to explain what was investigated, at what point the PFI became aware of the findings for the third-party service provider, and to clearly communicate what was assessed at the merchant and report those findings (conclusive or inconclusive).
- Whether the same PFI Company did or did not assess the third-party service provider and the merchant may affect the level of reporting; if the same PFI Company assessed both, they would reasonably have access to more relevant data than a PFI Company who did not assess the third-party service provider but is assessing an affected merchant.
- Where a third-party service provider PFI investigation has identified affected merchants and no PFI has been engaged for any affected merchant, it is recommended to consolidate the merchant cases into the third-party provider case as a matter of efficiency instead of opening an individual merchant PFI if required by a different workstream or regulatory agency. While the final decision does not rest with the PFI, the PFI must consult with Participating Payment Brands and affected acquirers on how to proceed with the investigation.
- Where there is sufficient evidence, based one or more merchant PFI investigation(s) that indicate the breach was caused by the third-party service provider, and the third-party service provider is not cooperative and/or has not engaged a PFI, the PFI must inform the Participating Payment Brands and affected acquirers.
Payment Brand contact details are provided in FAQ #1142 How do I contact the payment card brands?
August 2024
Article Number: 1571
Related
-
Do ASV scans in SAQ A apply to merchants with webpages that redirect to TPSPs or include TPSPs’ embedded iframes?
-
Are authentication values from a 3DS transaction considered sensitive authentication data for PCI DSS purposes?
-
Should entities with enterprise or internal service providers, used to provide internal services to other corporate entities, conduct separate PCI DSS assessments of these service providers or include them as part of each corporate entity’s PCI DSS assessment?
Featured FAQ Articles
Featured
-
Do PCI DSS requirements for keyed cryptographic hashing apply to previously hashed PANs?
-
Is the PCI DSS Attestation of Compliance intended to be shared?
-
How does an entity report the results of a PCI DSS assessment for new requirements that are noted in PCI DSS as best practices until a future date?
-
Where do I direct questions about complying with PCI standards?
-
Can SAQ eligibility criteria be used as a guide for determining applicability of PCI DSS requirements for merchant assessments documented in a Report on Compliance?
Most Popular
-
What are acceptable formats for truncation of primary account numbers?
-
For PCI DSS, why is storage of sensitive authentication data (SAD) after authorization not permitted even when there are no primary account numbers (PANs) in an environment?
-
How does an e-commerce merchant meet the SAQ A eligibility criteria for scripts?
-
If an organization provides software or functionality that runs on a consumer's device (for example, smartphones, tablets, or laptops) and is used to accept payment account data, can the organization store card verification codes for those consumers?
-
Are truncated Primary Account Numbers (PAN) required to be protected in accordance with PCI DSS?
Most Recently Updated
-
Are authentication values from a 3DS transaction considered sensitive authentication data for PCI DSS purposes?
-
Can SAQ eligibility criteria be used as a guide for determining applicability of PCI DSS requirements for merchant assessments documented in a Report on Compliance?
-
Does PCI DSS define which versions of TLS must be used?
-
Do ASV scans in SAQ A apply to merchants with webpages that redirect to TPSPs or include TPSPs’ embedded iframes?
-
Is sampling allowed in PCI DSS v4.x?