Frequently Asked Question
Can PFIs provide reports to their clients before sending the report to the affected payment brands?
No. It is not acceptable for reports (draft or final) to be issued to clients, acquirers, issuers, or other parties for review/amendment before being sent to payment brands and/or acquirers. PCI Forensic Investigators (PFIs) are obliged under the terms of the PFI Program Guide to provide Preliminary Incident Response Reports and Final PFI Reports to their client, each affected payment brand, and their client's affected acquirer(s). The reports must be sent to all parties (clients, affected payment brands and all affected acquirer(s) identified in Appendix C of the Final PFI Report) at the same time.
Appendix A of the PFI Program Guide describes the provisions PFI Companies must include in their contracts to support the report delivery requirements. Appendix C: Impacted Entities should be broken out into separate lists for each acquirer (if more than one acquirer is involved), with a complete "master list" provided to each affected payment brand.
The judgements, conclusions, and findings in PFI reports must be based solely on the factual evidence obtained during the investigation and reflect the independent judgement, findings, and conclusion of the PFI company. If an amendment is required to a Final PFI Report post-issue, for example to correct a factual error or omission, the amendment must be clearly evidenced in the Table of Changes in the revised report and the report version number incremented appropriately.
Related
-
Do ASV scans in SAQ A apply to merchants with webpages that redirect to TPSPs or include TPSPs’ embedded iframes?
-
Are authentication values from a 3DS transaction considered sensitive authentication data for PCI DSS purposes?
-
Should entities with enterprise or internal service providers, used to provide internal services to other corporate entities, conduct separate PCI DSS assessments of these service providers or include them as part of each corporate entity’s PCI DSS assessment?
Featured FAQ Articles
Featured
-
Do PCI DSS requirements for keyed cryptographic hashing apply to previously hashed PANs?
-
Is the PCI DSS Attestation of Compliance intended to be shared?
-
How does an entity report the results of a PCI DSS assessment for new requirements that are noted in PCI DSS as best practices until a future date?
-
Where do I direct questions about complying with PCI standards?
-
Can SAQ eligibility criteria be used as a guide for determining applicability of PCI DSS requirements for merchant assessments documented in a Report on Compliance?
Most Popular
-
What are acceptable formats for truncation of primary account numbers?
-
For PCI DSS, why is storage of sensitive authentication data (SAD) after authorization not permitted even when there are no primary account numbers (PANs) in an environment?
-
How does an e-commerce merchant meet the SAQ A eligibility criteria for scripts?
-
If an organization provides software or functionality that runs on a consumer's device (for example, smartphones, tablets, or laptops) and is used to accept payment account data, can the organization store card verification codes for those consumers?
-
Are truncated Primary Account Numbers (PAN) required to be protected in accordance with PCI DSS?
Most Recently Updated
-
Are authentication values from a 3DS transaction considered sensitive authentication data for PCI DSS purposes?
-
Can SAQ eligibility criteria be used as a guide for determining applicability of PCI DSS requirements for merchant assessments documented in a Report on Compliance?
-
Does PCI DSS define which versions of TLS must be used?
-
Do ASV scans in SAQ A apply to merchants with webpages that redirect to TPSPs or include TPSPs’ embedded iframes?
-
Is sampling allowed in PCI DSS v4.x?