Frequently Asked Question
Why is SAQ A-EP used for Direct Post while SAQ A is used for iFrame or URL redirect?
There is a distinct difference in terms of how payment data is accepted between Direct Post & iFrames/redirects, which is why there are different SAQs. In a Direct Post implementation, the merchant website produces some or all of the web page that is used to accept payment data, and then passes it directly to the third-party payment processor. In this implementation, the consumer (cardholder) never leaves the merchant website. Conversely, with a redirect or iFrame, the third-party payment processor produces the webpage that accepts payment data. The merchant website is not directly involved in the acceptance of payment data as this is directly accepted by the third-party payment processor. In these implementations, the consumer leaves the merchant website and goes to the payment processor for payment acceptance and processing.
This data flow is a key difference between the different methods, and is reflected in the eligibility criteria for SAQ A and SAQ A-EP as follows:
-
SAQ A: All elements of the payment page(s) delivered to the consumer's browser originate only and directly from a PCI DSS validated third-party service provider(s)
- SAQ A-EP: Each element of the payment page(s) delivered to the consumer's browser originates from either the merchant's website or a PCI DSS compliant service provider(s)
Related
-
Are authentication values from a 3DS transaction considered sensitive authentication data for PCI DSS purposes?
-
Should entities with enterprise or internal service providers, used to provide internal services to other corporate entities, conduct separate PCI DSS assessments of these service providers or include them as part of each corporate entity’s PCI DSS assessment?
-
What is the impact if an entity uses a third-party service provider (TPSP) to meet a PCI DSS requirement(s), when that TPSP’s PCI DSS assessment completion date is close to a year ago, as documented in the TPSP’s Attestation of Compliance (AOC)?
Featured FAQ Articles
Featured
-
Do PCI DSS requirements for keyed cryptographic hashing apply to previously hashed PANs?
-
Is the PCI DSS Attestation of Compliance intended to be shared?
-
How does an entity report the results of a PCI DSS assessment for new requirements that are noted in PCI DSS as best practices until a future date?
-
Where do I direct questions about complying with PCI standards?
-
Can SAQ eligibility criteria be used as a guide for determining applicability of PCI DSS requirements for merchant assessments documented in a Report on Compliance?
Most Popular
-
Are authentication values from a 3DS transaction considered sensitive authentication data for PCI DSS purposes?
-
Should entities with enterprise or internal service providers, used to provide internal services to other corporate entities, conduct separate PCI DSS assessments of these service providers or include them as part of each corporate entity’s PCI DSS assessment?
-
What is the impact if an entity uses a third-party service provider (TPSP) to meet a PCI DSS requirement(s), when that TPSP’s PCI DSS assessment completion date is close to a year ago, as documented in the TPSP’s Attestation of Compliance (AOC)?
-
Are Approved Scanning Vendors and Qualified Security Assessors considered third-party service providers for PCI DSS Requirements 12.8 and 12.9?
-
What are the expectations for entities when assigning risk rankings to vulnerabilities and resolving or addressing those vulnerabilities?
Most Recently Updated
-
Are authentication values from a 3DS transaction considered sensitive authentication data for PCI DSS purposes?
-
Is sampling allowed in PCI DSS v4.x?
-
How does PCI DSS apply to payment terminals?
-
How does encrypted cardholder data impact PCI DSS scope?
-
How does encrypted cardholder data impact PCI DSS scope for third-party service providers?