Frequently Asked Question
Why is SAQ A-EP used for Direct Post while SAQ A is used for iFrame or URL redirect?
There is a distinct difference in terms of how payment data is accepted between Direct Post & iFrames/redirects, which is why there are different SAQs. In a Direct Post implementation, the merchant website produces some or all of the web page that is used to accept payment data, and then passes it directly to the third-party payment processor. In this implementation, the consumer (cardholder) never leaves the merchant website. Conversely, with a redirect or iFrame, the third-party payment processor produces the webpage that accepts payment data. The merchant website is not directly involved in the acceptance of payment data as this is directly accepted by the third-party payment processor. In these implementations, the consumer leaves the merchant website and goes to the payment processor for payment acceptance and processing.
This data flow is a key difference between the different methods, and is reflected in the eligibility criteria for SAQ A and SAQ A-EP as follows:
-
SAQ A: All elements of the payment page(s) delivered to the consumer's browser originate only and directly from a PCI DSS validated third-party service provider(s)
- SAQ A-EP: Each element of the payment page(s) delivered to the consumer's browser originates from either the merchant's website or a PCI DSS compliant service provider(s)
Related
-
Do ASV scans in SAQ A apply to merchants with webpages that redirect to TPSPs or include TPSPs’ embedded iframes?
-
Are authentication values from a 3DS transaction considered sensitive authentication data for PCI DSS purposes?
-
Should entities with enterprise or internal service providers, used to provide internal services to other corporate entities, conduct separate PCI DSS assessments of these service providers or include them as part of each corporate entity’s PCI DSS assessment?
Featured FAQ Articles
Featured
-
Do PCI DSS requirements for keyed cryptographic hashing apply to previously hashed PANs?
-
Is the PCI DSS Attestation of Compliance intended to be shared?
-
How does an entity report the results of a PCI DSS assessment for new requirements that are noted in PCI DSS as best practices until a future date?
-
Where do I direct questions about complying with PCI standards?
-
Can SAQ eligibility criteria be used as a guide for determining applicability of PCI DSS requirements for merchant assessments documented in a Report on Compliance?
Most Popular
-
What are acceptable formats for truncation of primary account numbers?
-
For PCI DSS, why is storage of sensitive authentication data (SAD) after authorization not permitted even when there are no primary account numbers (PANs) in an environment?
-
How does an e-commerce merchant meet the SAQ A eligibility criteria for scripts?
-
If an organization provides software or functionality that runs on a consumer's device (for example, smartphones, tablets, or laptops) and is used to accept payment account data, can the organization store card verification codes for those consumers?
-
Are truncated Primary Account Numbers (PAN) required to be protected in accordance with PCI DSS?
Most Recently Updated
-
Are authentication values from a 3DS transaction considered sensitive authentication data for PCI DSS purposes?
-
Can SAQ eligibility criteria be used as a guide for determining applicability of PCI DSS requirements for merchant assessments documented in a Report on Compliance?
-
Does PCI DSS define which versions of TLS must be used?
-
Do ASV scans in SAQ A apply to merchants with webpages that redirect to TPSPs or include TPSPs’ embedded iframes?
-
Is sampling allowed in PCI DSS v4.x?