Frequently Asked Question
When should an entity implement PCI DSS requirements noted as best practices until a future date?
Updates to PCI DSS are intended to address evolving threats in the payments ecosystem, therefore, entities are strongly encouraged to complete their transition to the most current PCI DSS version, including the adoption of new requirements, as early as possible.
Future-dated requirements that have not yet been implemented by the entity may be marked as “Not Applicable” in any Report on Compliance (ROC) or Self-Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ) completed prior to the requirement’s effective date. However, commencing on the new requirements’ effective date, all requirements applicable to an entity's assessment, including the newly effective requirements, must be fully considered as part of the entity's PCI DSS assessment.
Note that questions about compliance programs and reporting requirements, including whether there are any specific reporting requirements for new requirements, should be directed to compliance-accepting entities, which are the entities to which those assessment results (for example, a Report on Compliance) are submitted. The compliance-accepting entity is typically a payment brand or acquirer.
Contact details for the payment brands can be found in FAQ #1142: How do I contact the payment card brands?
Also refer to the following FAQs:
- FAQ 1485: What is the meaning of ‘initial PCI DSS assessment’?
- FAQ 1266: If an entity is in the middle of a PCI DSS assessment when a new version of the standard is released-should the assessment be started again using the new version?
- FAQ 1564: How does an entity report the results of a PCI DSS assessment for new requirements that are noted in PCI DSS as best practices until a future date?
- FAQ 1573: Do PCI DSS requirements for keyed cryptographic hashing apply to previously hashed PANs?
Related
-
Should entities with enterprise or internal service providers, used to provide internal services to other corporate entities, conduct separate PCI DSS assessments of these service providers or include them as part of each corporate entity’s PCI DSS assessment?
-
What is the impact if an entity uses a third-party service provider (TPSP) to meet a PCI DSS requirement(s), when that TPSP’s PCI DSS assessment completion date is close to a year ago, as documented in the TPSP’s Attestation of Compliance (AOC)?
-
Are Approved Scanning Vendors and Qualified Security Assessors considered third-party service providers for PCI DSS Requirements 12.8 and 12.9?
Featured FAQ Articles
Featured
-
Do PCI DSS requirements for keyed cryptographic hashing apply to previously hashed PANs?
-
Is the PCI DSS Attestation of Compliance intended to be shared?
-
How does an entity report the results of a PCI DSS assessment for new requirements that are noted in PCI DSS as best practices until a future date?
-
Where do I direct questions about complying with PCI standards?
-
Can SAQ eligibility criteria be used as a guide for determining applicability of PCI DSS requirements for merchant assessments documented in a Report on Compliance?
Most Popular
-
Should entities with enterprise or internal service providers, used to provide internal services to other corporate entities, conduct separate PCI DSS assessments of these service providers or include them as part of each corporate entity’s PCI DSS assessment?
-
What is the impact if an entity uses a third-party service provider (TPSP) to meet a PCI DSS requirement(s), when that TPSP’s PCI DSS assessment completion date is close to a year ago, as documented in the TPSP’s Attestation of Compliance (AOC)?
-
Are Approved Scanning Vendors and Qualified Security Assessors considered third-party service providers for PCI DSS Requirements 12.8 and 12.9?
-
What are the expectations for entities when assigning risk rankings to vulnerabilities and resolving or addressing those vulnerabilities?
-
Is phishing-resistant authentication alone acceptable as multi-factor authentication for PCI DSS Requirements 8.4.1 and 8.4.3?
Most Recently Updated
-
Should entities with enterprise or internal service providers, used to provide internal services to other corporate entities, conduct separate PCI DSS assessments of these service providers or include them as part of each corporate entity’s PCI DSS assessment?
-
What is the Council's guidance on the use of SHA-1?
-
In what circumstances is multi-factor authentication required?
-
Is two-step authentication acceptable for PCI DSS Requirement 8.4?
-
How can hashing be used to protect Primary Account Numbers (PAN) and in what circumstances can hashed PANs be considered out of scope for PCI DSS?