Frequently Asked Question

What are the expectations for entities when assigning risk rankings to vulnerabilities and resolving or addressing those vulnerabilities?
There are several PCI DSS requirements that govern vulnerability management and reference related timeframes. These requirements are described under the general topics of 1) identifying and risk ranking vulnerabilities, and 2) resolving or addressing vulnerabilities.
Vulnerability Management Infographic
Identify and risk-rank vulnerabilities:
Requirements 11.3.1 and 11.3.1.1 specify internal vulnerability scans. The information from an entity’s internal vulnerability scans should be used as one of the inputs into the entity’s processes for identifying and risk-ranking vulnerabilities at Requirement 6.3.1.
After finding the vulnerabilities, Requirement 6.3.1 specifies that entities manage security vulnerabilities, including assigning risk rankings based on impact to the entity and identifying at a minimum those vulnerabilities considered to be high-risk or critical to the entity’s environment. Note that Requirement 6.3.1 does not require that an entity accepts risk rankings assigned by external sources; rather the entity may evaluate external risk rankings considering the entity’s risk and environment and then assign the appropriate risk ranking for the entity’s environment.
Resolve or address vulnerabilities:
Requirements 11.3.1 and 11.3.1.1 also specify that critical and high-risk vulnerabilities are resolved*, and that lower-ranked vulnerabilities are addressed** in accordance with the entity’s risk as defined and documented in a targeted risk analysis (TRA).
PCI DSS Requirement 6.3.3 specifies time frames for installing security patches/updates – those for critical vulnerabilities must be resolved within one month of release. Additionally, all other applicable security patches/updates must be installed within appropriate time frames determined by the entity’s assessment of the risk to their environment. The appropriate time frames defined by the entity should align with the risk ranking of vulnerabilities assigned in Requirement 6.3.1 (for example, resolving high-risk vulnerabilities more quickly than lower-ranked vulnerabilities). Refer to the Requirement 6.3.3 Guidance column under Examples for more information.
* Resolved – the entity solves or fixes the vulnerability.
** Addressed - the entity determines whether to resolve the vulnerability or to mitigate the risk by addressing the vulnerability in another way (e.g., with a compensating control or by disabling a vulnerable service).
Related
-
Is phishing-resistant authentication alone acceptable as multi-factor authentication for PCI DSS Requirements 8.4.1 and 8.4.3?
-
Are passkeys synced across devices, implemented according to the FIDO2 requirements, acceptable for use as phishing-resistant authentication to meet PCI DSS Requirement 8.4.2?
Featured FAQ Articles
Featured
-
Do PCI DSS requirements for keyed cryptographic hashing apply to previously hashed PANs?
-
Is the PCI DSS Attestation of Compliance intended to be shared?
-
How does an entity report the results of a PCI DSS assessment for new requirements that are noted in PCI DSS as best practices until a future date?
-
Where do I direct questions about complying with PCI standards?
-
Can SAQ eligibility criteria be used as a guide for determining applicability of PCI DSS requirements for merchant assessments documented in a Report on Compliance?
Most Popular
-
What are the expectations for entities when assigning risk rankings to vulnerabilities and resolving or addressing those vulnerabilities?
-
Is phishing-resistant authentication alone acceptable as multi-factor authentication for PCI DSS Requirements 8.4.1 and 8.4.3?
-
Are passkeys synced across devices, implemented according to the FIDO2 requirements, acceptable for use as phishing-resistant authentication to meet PCI DSS Requirement 8.4.2?
-
How should PCI DSS v4.x requirements noted as superseded by another requirement be reported after 31 March 2025?
-
Are providers of third-party scripts for e-commerce environments considered third-party service providers for PCI DSS Requirements 12.8 and 12.9?
Most Recently Updated
-
What are the expectations for entities when assigning risk rankings to vulnerabilities and resolving or addressing those vulnerabilities?
-
Can SAQ eligibility criteria be used as a guide for determining applicability of PCI DSS requirements for merchant assessments documented in a Report on Compliance?
-
Is phishing-resistant authentication alone acceptable as multi-factor authentication for PCI DSS Requirements 8.4.1 and 8.4.3?
-
Are passkeys synced across devices, implemented according to the FIDO2 requirements, acceptable for use as phishing-resistant authentication to meet PCI DSS Requirement 8.4.2?
-
How should PCI DSS v4.x requirements noted as superseded by another requirement be reported after 31 March 2025?