Frequently Asked Question

Is the expectation that any PFI investigation initiated must result in a PFI Final Report?
Yes, a PFI Final Report is required. The expectation is that the PFI must complete the merchant's PFI Investigation and produce the Final PFI Report, with details of adequate evidence to support claims.
PCI SSC has received multiple inquiries on how to move forward on a third-party service provider case where the breach has been confirmed to have occurred and affected merchants, particularly where some affected merchants may have already begun their own PFI engagements. While there is no "one size fits all" response to such inquiry, PCI SSC can provide the following guidance to PFIs in determining next steps:
- When a PFI investigates a third-party service provider incident, scoping should include steps to identify and include any third-party connections as part of incident validation and assessment, including affected merchants and their sponsoring acquirers.
- In the example of a merchant for which a PFI has already completed the PFI Preliminary Incident Response Report and delivered it to each affected Participating Payment Brand before evidence that a third-party service provider was in fact responsible for the breach affecting the merchant is produced, PFIs are expected to fully complete a Final PFI Report for the merchant. The PFI is expected to complete the merchant investigation and provide confirmation and document in the final PFI report that the breach is related to the third-party service provider incident. It would be reasonable to explain what was investigated, at what point the PFI became aware of the findings for the third-party service provider, and to clearly communicate what was assessed at the merchant and report those findings (conclusive or inconclusive).
- Whether the same PFI Company did or did not assess the third-party service provider and the merchant may affect the level of reporting; if the same PFI Company assessed both, they would reasonably have access to more relevant data than a PFI Company who did not assess the third-party service provider but is assessing an affected merchant.
- Where a third-party service provider PFI investigation has identified affected merchants and no PFI has been engaged for any affected merchant, it is recommended to consolidate the merchant cases into the third-party provider case as a matter of efficiency instead of opening an individual merchant PFI if required by a different workstream or regulatory agency. While the final decision does not rest with the PFI, the PFI must consult with Participating Payment Brands and affected acquirers on how to proceed with the investigation.
- Where there is sufficient evidence, based one or more merchant PFI investigation(s) that indicate the breach was caused by the third-party service provider, and the third-party service provider is not cooperative and/or has not engaged a PFI, the PFI must inform the Participating Payment Brands and affected acquirers.
Payment Brand contact details are provided in FAQ #1142 How do I contact the payment card brands?
August 2024
Article Number: 1571
Related
-
Are Approved Scanning Vendors and Qualified Security Assessors considered third-party service providers for PCI DSS Requirements 12.8 and 12.9?
-
What are the expectations for entities when assigning risk rankings to vulnerabilities and resolving or addressing those vulnerabilities?
-
Is phishing-resistant authentication alone acceptable as multi-factor authentication for PCI DSS Requirements 8.4.1 and 8.4.3?
Featured FAQ Articles
Featured
-
Do PCI DSS requirements for keyed cryptographic hashing apply to previously hashed PANs?
-
Is the PCI DSS Attestation of Compliance intended to be shared?
-
How does an entity report the results of a PCI DSS assessment for new requirements that are noted in PCI DSS as best practices until a future date?
-
Where do I direct questions about complying with PCI standards?
-
Can SAQ eligibility criteria be used as a guide for determining applicability of PCI DSS requirements for merchant assessments documented in a Report on Compliance?
Most Popular
-
Are Approved Scanning Vendors and Qualified Security Assessors considered third-party service providers for PCI DSS Requirements 12.8 and 12.9?
-
What are the expectations for entities when assigning risk rankings to vulnerabilities and resolving or addressing those vulnerabilities?
-
Is phishing-resistant authentication alone acceptable as multi-factor authentication for PCI DSS Requirements 8.4.1 and 8.4.3?
-
Are passkeys synced across devices, implemented according to the FIDO2 requirements, acceptable for use as phishing-resistant authentication to meet PCI DSS Requirement 8.4.2?
-
How should PCI DSS v4.x requirements noted as superseded by another requirement be reported after 31 March 2025?
Most Recently Updated
-
Are Approved Scanning Vendors and Qualified Security Assessors considered third-party service providers for PCI DSS Requirements 12.8 and 12.9?
-
Can a compensating control be used for requirements with a periodic or defined frequency, where an entity did not perform the activity within the required timeframe?
-
How often must service providers test penetration testing segmentation controls under PCI DSS?
-
Are merchants allowed to request card-verification codes/values from cardholders?
-
What is the maximum period of time that cardholder data can be stored?