Frequently Asked Question

Is it expected that P2PE applications be assessed per Domain 2 requirements (for example, 2A-1.2.c) if forensics tools are not effective due to architectural constraints of the POI device?
This is a Technical FAQ for P2PE versions 1.x. This is a "normative" FAQ that is considered to be part of the P2PE requirements and shall be considered during a P2PE assessment in the same light as the published P2PE standard. These technical FAQs are also published together in "Technical FAQs for use with P2PE Versions 1.x" available in the Documents Library of this website.
It is the expectation of PCI SSC that a P2PE assessor conducting an application vendor assessment is given sufficient access to both the device and application to confirm that the P2PE requirements are actually met. The assessor should be able to install the application per the POI device vendor's security guidance and the application's Implementation Guide, run test transactions through the device, and then confirm that the installed configuration meets requirements (in the case of 2A-1.2.c, that any PAN or SAD stored by the application during processing is securely deleted).
It is the expectation of PCI SSC that a P2PE assessor conducting an application vendor assessment is given sufficient access to both the device and application to confirm that the P2PE requirements are actually met. The assessor should be able to install the application per the POI device vendor's security guidance and the application's Implementation Guide, run test transactions through the device, and then confirm that the installed configuration meets requirements (in the case of 2A-1.2.c, that any PAN or SAD stored by the application during processing is securely deleted).
December 2015
Article Number: 1343
Related
-
What are the expectations for entities when assigning risk rankings to vulnerabilities and resolving or addressing those vulnerabilities?
-
Is phishing-resistant authentication alone acceptable as multi-factor authentication for PCI DSS Requirements 8.4.1 and 8.4.3?
-
Are passkeys synced across devices, implemented according to the FIDO2 requirements, acceptable for use as phishing-resistant authentication to meet PCI DSS Requirement 8.4.2?
Featured FAQ Articles
Featured
-
Do PCI DSS requirements for keyed cryptographic hashing apply to previously hashed PANs?
-
Is the PCI DSS Attestation of Compliance intended to be shared?
-
How does an entity report the results of a PCI DSS assessment for new requirements that are noted in PCI DSS as best practices until a future date?
-
Where do I direct questions about complying with PCI standards?
-
Can SAQ eligibility criteria be used as a guide for determining applicability of PCI DSS requirements for merchant assessments documented in a Report on Compliance?
Most Popular
-
What are the expectations for entities when assigning risk rankings to vulnerabilities and resolving or addressing those vulnerabilities?
-
Is phishing-resistant authentication alone acceptable as multi-factor authentication for PCI DSS Requirements 8.4.1 and 8.4.3?
-
Are passkeys synced across devices, implemented according to the FIDO2 requirements, acceptable for use as phishing-resistant authentication to meet PCI DSS Requirement 8.4.2?
-
How should PCI DSS v4.x requirements noted as superseded by another requirement be reported after 31 March 2025?
-
Are providers of third-party scripts for e-commerce environments considered third-party service providers for PCI DSS Requirements 12.8 and 12.9?
Most Recently Updated
-
How often must service providers test penetration testing segmentation controls under PCI DSS?
-
Are merchants allowed to request card-verification codes/values from cardholders?
-
What is the maximum period of time that cardholder data can be stored?
-
How can an entity ensure that hashed and truncated versions cannot be correlated?
-
Are point-of-interaction devices required to be physically secured (for example, with a cable or tether) to prevent removal or substitution to meet PCI DSS Requirement 9.5?