Frequently Asked Question
Is it acceptable to make minor changes to a PA-DSS validated application and retain the existing version number?
All changes to the software of a validated PA-DSS application must result in a new version number, even if there is no impact on PA-DSS requirements. This is necessary to ensure all parties involved can clearly determine whether a particular version of an application is PA-DSS validated. Note that an application may have multiple versions listed as PA-DSS validated, but only those specific versions listed on the PCI SSC website are considered PA-DSS validated.
If an Administrative Change (as defined in the PA-DSS Program Guide) is made to an application such that there is no change to the software itself (for example, corporate entity name change), then the version number of the application may remain unchanged at the application vendor's discretion. The application vendor should follow the process set out in the PA-DSS Program Guide in order for the List of Validated Payment Applications to be updated.
If an Administrative Change (as defined in the PA-DSS Program Guide) is made to an application such that there is no change to the software itself (for example, corporate entity name change), then the version number of the application may remain unchanged at the application vendor's discretion. The application vendor should follow the process set out in the PA-DSS Program Guide in order for the List of Validated Payment Applications to be updated.
November 2012
Article Number: 1182
Related
-
Should entities with enterprise or internal service providers, used to provide internal services to other corporate entities, conduct separate PCI DSS assessments of these service providers or include them as part of each corporate entity’s PCI DSS assessment?
-
What is the impact if an entity uses a third-party service provider (TPSP) to meet a PCI DSS requirement(s), when that TPSP’s PCI DSS assessment completion date is close to a year ago, as documented in the TPSP’s Attestation of Compliance (AOC)?
-
Are Approved Scanning Vendors and Qualified Security Assessors considered third-party service providers for PCI DSS Requirements 12.8 and 12.9?
Featured FAQ Articles
Featured
-
Do PCI DSS requirements for keyed cryptographic hashing apply to previously hashed PANs?
-
Is the PCI DSS Attestation of Compliance intended to be shared?
-
How does an entity report the results of a PCI DSS assessment for new requirements that are noted in PCI DSS as best practices until a future date?
-
Where do I direct questions about complying with PCI standards?
-
Can SAQ eligibility criteria be used as a guide for determining applicability of PCI DSS requirements for merchant assessments documented in a Report on Compliance?
Most Popular
-
Should entities with enterprise or internal service providers, used to provide internal services to other corporate entities, conduct separate PCI DSS assessments of these service providers or include them as part of each corporate entity’s PCI DSS assessment?
-
What is the impact if an entity uses a third-party service provider (TPSP) to meet a PCI DSS requirement(s), when that TPSP’s PCI DSS assessment completion date is close to a year ago, as documented in the TPSP’s Attestation of Compliance (AOC)?
-
Are Approved Scanning Vendors and Qualified Security Assessors considered third-party service providers for PCI DSS Requirements 12.8 and 12.9?
-
What are the expectations for entities when assigning risk rankings to vulnerabilities and resolving or addressing those vulnerabilities?
-
Is phishing-resistant authentication alone acceptable as multi-factor authentication for PCI DSS Requirements 8.4.1 and 8.4.3?
Most Recently Updated
-
Should entities with enterprise or internal service providers, used to provide internal services to other corporate entities, conduct separate PCI DSS assessments of these service providers or include them as part of each corporate entity’s PCI DSS assessment?
-
What is the Council's guidance on the use of SHA-1?
-
In what circumstances is multi-factor authentication required?
-
Is two-step authentication acceptable for PCI DSS Requirement 8.4?
-
How can hashing be used to protect Primary Account Numbers (PAN) and in what circumstances can hashed PANs be considered out of scope for PCI DSS?