Frequently Asked Question
Is intrusion detection required if centralized log correlation is in place?
Although log correlation is a valuable tool in a company's information security strategy, it does not replace intrusion detection mechanisms, such as IDS/IPS. Intrusion detection mechanisms provide proactive detection of threats coming into the network by comparing network traffic against known "signatures" or behaviors of different compromise types (e.g. hacker tools, Trojans, and other malware). Intrusion-detection and/or intrusion-prevention techniques are required by PCI DSS Requirement 11. In addition, logs from the intrusion-detection and/or intrusion-prevention mechanisms should be included in the daily log reviews, as required in PCI DSS Requirement 10. Note that the use of log harvesting, parsing, and alerting tools can be used to facilitate the process by identifying log events that need to be reviewed.
Related
-
What is the impact if an entity uses a third-party service provider (TPSP) to meet a PCI DSS requirement(s), when that TPSP’s PCI DSS assessment completion date is close to a year ago, as documented in the TPSP’s Attestation of Compliance (AOC)?
-
Are Approved Scanning Vendors and Qualified Security Assessors considered third-party service providers for PCI DSS Requirements 12.8 and 12.9?
-
What are the expectations for entities when assigning risk rankings to vulnerabilities and resolving or addressing those vulnerabilities?
Featured FAQ Articles
Featured
-
Do PCI DSS requirements for keyed cryptographic hashing apply to previously hashed PANs?
-
Is the PCI DSS Attestation of Compliance intended to be shared?
-
How does an entity report the results of a PCI DSS assessment for new requirements that are noted in PCI DSS as best practices until a future date?
-
Where do I direct questions about complying with PCI standards?
-
Can SAQ eligibility criteria be used as a guide for determining applicability of PCI DSS requirements for merchant assessments documented in a Report on Compliance?
Most Popular
-
What is the impact if an entity uses a third-party service provider (TPSP) to meet a PCI DSS requirement(s), when that TPSP’s PCI DSS assessment completion date is close to a year ago, as documented in the TPSP’s Attestation of Compliance (AOC)?
-
Are Approved Scanning Vendors and Qualified Security Assessors considered third-party service providers for PCI DSS Requirements 12.8 and 12.9?
-
What are the expectations for entities when assigning risk rankings to vulnerabilities and resolving or addressing those vulnerabilities?
-
Is phishing-resistant authentication alone acceptable as multi-factor authentication for PCI DSS Requirements 8.4.1 and 8.4.3?
-
Are passkeys synced across devices, implemented according to the FIDO2 requirements, acceptable for use as phishing-resistant authentication to meet PCI DSS Requirement 8.4.2?
Most Recently Updated
-
How do individuals obtain examination accommodation or adjustments for PCI SSC programs?
-
Are OEMs and/or hardware/software resellers considered third-party service providers for PCI DSS Requirements 12.8 and 12.9?
-
What is the purpose of PCI DSS Requirement 8.2.8, which requires users to reauthenticate after 15 minutes of idle time?
-
What is the impact if an entity uses a third-party service provider (TPSP) to meet a PCI DSS requirement(s), when that TPSP’s PCI DSS assessment completion date is close to a year ago, as documented in the TPSP’s Attestation of Compliance (AOC)?
-
To which types of service providers does PCI DSS Appendix A1 for Multi-Tenant Service Providers apply?