Frequently Asked Question

Does cardholder name, expiration date, etc. need to be rendered unreadable if stored in conjunction with the PAN (Primary Account Number)?
For information about protecting different elements of cardholder data (CHD), please refer to the tables provided in the "PCI DSS Applicability Information" section in the PCI DSS. The tables illustrates that, if cardholder name, service code, and/or expiration date are stored, processed or transmitted with the PAN, or are otherwise present in the cardholder data environment, they must be protected in accordance with applicable PCI DSS requirements.
This means that all applicable PCI DSS requirements, such as firewalls, patches, anti-virus, access controls, policies and procedures, etc., must be applied for protection of those cardholder data elements. However, only the PAN itself must be rendered unreadable in accordance with Requirement 3.4.
If these other elements of cardholder data (that is, cardholder name, expiry date and/or service code) are present without any PAN, then PCI DSS would not apply to those elements.
Related
-
What are the expectations for entities when assigning risk rankings to vulnerabilities and resolving or addressing those vulnerabilities?
-
Is phishing-resistant authentication alone acceptable as multi-factor authentication for PCI DSS Requirements 8.4.1 and 8.4.3?
-
Are passkeys synced across devices, implemented according to the FIDO2 requirements, acceptable for use as phishing-resistant authentication to meet PCI DSS Requirement 8.4.2?
Featured FAQ Articles
Featured
-
Do PCI DSS requirements for keyed cryptographic hashing apply to previously hashed PANs?
-
Is the PCI DSS Attestation of Compliance intended to be shared?
-
How does an entity report the results of a PCI DSS assessment for new requirements that are noted in PCI DSS as best practices until a future date?
-
Where do I direct questions about complying with PCI standards?
-
Can SAQ eligibility criteria be used as a guide for determining applicability of PCI DSS requirements for merchant assessments documented in a Report on Compliance?
Most Popular
-
What are the expectations for entities when assigning risk rankings to vulnerabilities and resolving or addressing those vulnerabilities?
-
Is phishing-resistant authentication alone acceptable as multi-factor authentication for PCI DSS Requirements 8.4.1 and 8.4.3?
-
Are passkeys synced across devices, implemented according to the FIDO2 requirements, acceptable for use as phishing-resistant authentication to meet PCI DSS Requirement 8.4.2?
-
How should PCI DSS v4.x requirements noted as superseded by another requirement be reported after 31 March 2025?
-
Are providers of third-party scripts for e-commerce environments considered third-party service providers for PCI DSS Requirements 12.8 and 12.9?
Most Recently Updated
-
What are the expectations for entities when assigning risk rankings to vulnerabilities and resolving or addressing those vulnerabilities?
-
Can SAQ eligibility criteria be used as a guide for determining applicability of PCI DSS requirements for merchant assessments documented in a Report on Compliance?
-
Is phishing-resistant authentication alone acceptable as multi-factor authentication for PCI DSS Requirements 8.4.1 and 8.4.3?
-
Are passkeys synced across devices, implemented according to the FIDO2 requirements, acceptable for use as phishing-resistant authentication to meet PCI DSS Requirement 8.4.2?
-
How should PCI DSS v4.x requirements noted as superseded by another requirement be reported after 31 March 2025?