Frequently Asked Question
Do PANs need to be masked on cardholder statements sent by issuers to customers?
PCI DSS Requirement 3 is not intended to apply to individual account statements sent by issuing banks to cardholders. Full PAN displays in individual account statements are not required to be masked or rendered unreadable. The reference to "paper reports" in Requirement 3 is intended to apply to back-office reports and other internal paper reports that are not intended for distribution to individual cardholders.
With that said, Issuers should strongly consider masking or truncating PAN on any account statements, whether in paper or electronic form, as the presence of full PAN in addition to other information listed on account statements (such as name, address, telephone number, etc.) could provide a malicious individual with enough information to masquerade as the cardholder.
Issuers with a legitimate business need to display full PAN on account statements can do so, but may wish to contact the payment brands directly to discuss possible alternatives. Contact details for the payment brands can be found in FAQ 1142 - How do I contact the payment card brands?
Note: The specific sub requirement number(s) and terminology may vary depending on the version of the standard being used.
Related
-
Are authentication values from a 3DS transaction considered sensitive authentication data for PCI DSS purposes?
-
Should entities with enterprise or internal service providers, used to provide internal services to other corporate entities, conduct separate PCI DSS assessments of these service providers or include them as part of each corporate entity’s PCI DSS assessment?
-
What is the impact if an entity uses a third-party service provider (TPSP) to meet a PCI DSS requirement(s), when that TPSP’s PCI DSS assessment completion date is close to a year ago, as documented in the TPSP’s Attestation of Compliance (AOC)?
Featured FAQ Articles
Featured
-
Do PCI DSS requirements for keyed cryptographic hashing apply to previously hashed PANs?
-
Is the PCI DSS Attestation of Compliance intended to be shared?
-
How does an entity report the results of a PCI DSS assessment for new requirements that are noted in PCI DSS as best practices until a future date?
-
Where do I direct questions about complying with PCI standards?
-
Can SAQ eligibility criteria be used as a guide for determining applicability of PCI DSS requirements for merchant assessments documented in a Report on Compliance?
Most Popular
-
Are authentication values from a 3DS transaction considered sensitive authentication data for PCI DSS purposes?
-
Should entities with enterprise or internal service providers, used to provide internal services to other corporate entities, conduct separate PCI DSS assessments of these service providers or include them as part of each corporate entity’s PCI DSS assessment?
-
What is the impact if an entity uses a third-party service provider (TPSP) to meet a PCI DSS requirement(s), when that TPSP’s PCI DSS assessment completion date is close to a year ago, as documented in the TPSP’s Attestation of Compliance (AOC)?
-
Are Approved Scanning Vendors and Qualified Security Assessors considered third-party service providers for PCI DSS Requirements 12.8 and 12.9?
-
What are the expectations for entities when assigning risk rankings to vulnerabilities and resolving or addressing those vulnerabilities?
Most Recently Updated
-
Are authentication values from a 3DS transaction considered sensitive authentication data for PCI DSS purposes?
-
Is sampling allowed in PCI DSS v4.x?
-
How does PCI DSS apply to payment terminals?
-
How does encrypted cardholder data impact PCI DSS scope?
-
How does encrypted cardholder data impact PCI DSS scope for third-party service providers?