Frequently Asked Question
Can organizations use alternative password management methods to meet PCI DSS Requirement 8?
The password requirements in PCI DSS include a minimum level of complexity and strength intended to be met by all types of organizations using a range of technologies. PCI SSC encourages organizations to implement stronger controls or additional security measures as appropriate to meet their security needs.
PCI DSS allows organizations to implement alternative controls than those defined in the standard, as long as the intent of the PCI DSS requirements is met. When considering alternative methods, it is important not to view individual recommendations in isolation but to take all the recommendations as a complete set of controls. For example, when considering the alternative controls described in NIST Special Publication 800-63B, the exclusion of periodic password changes without implementing additional compensating controls would not meet the intent of either the NIST Special Publication or PCI DSS.
Any variation to an authentication method that has been defined in PCI DSS will require that the organization consider how the approach could impact other settings and processes as well as the overall impact to security. Organizations wishing to follow a different combination of password complexity and change frequency than those defined in PCI DSS should document their approach as a compensating control. As part of this process, the organization will need to demonstrate how the risk is mitigated and how the intent of the requirement is met through the implementation of other controls.
PCI SSC continually monitors changes in technologies and payment environments and may incorporate updates in future PCI DSS revisions as needed to support evolving industry best practices.
Related
-
Do ASV scans in SAQ A apply to merchants with webpages that redirect to TPSPs or include TPSPs’ embedded iframes?
-
Are authentication values from a 3DS transaction considered sensitive authentication data for PCI DSS purposes?
-
Should entities with enterprise or internal service providers, used to provide internal services to other corporate entities, conduct separate PCI DSS assessments of these service providers or include them as part of each corporate entity’s PCI DSS assessment?
Featured FAQ Articles
Featured
-
Do PCI DSS requirements for keyed cryptographic hashing apply to previously hashed PANs?
-
Is the PCI DSS Attestation of Compliance intended to be shared?
-
How does an entity report the results of a PCI DSS assessment for new requirements that are noted in PCI DSS as best practices until a future date?
-
Where do I direct questions about complying with PCI standards?
-
Can SAQ eligibility criteria be used as a guide for determining applicability of PCI DSS requirements for merchant assessments documented in a Report on Compliance?
Most Popular
-
What are acceptable formats for truncation of primary account numbers?
-
For PCI DSS, why is storage of sensitive authentication data (SAD) after authorization not permitted even when there are no primary account numbers (PANs) in an environment?
-
How does an e-commerce merchant meet the SAQ A eligibility criteria for scripts?
-
If an organization provides software or functionality that runs on a consumer's device (for example, smartphones, tablets, or laptops) and is used to accept payment account data, can the organization store card verification codes for those consumers?
-
Are truncated Primary Account Numbers (PAN) required to be protected in accordance with PCI DSS?
Most Recently Updated
-
Are authentication values from a 3DS transaction considered sensitive authentication data for PCI DSS purposes?
-
Can SAQ eligibility criteria be used as a guide for determining applicability of PCI DSS requirements for merchant assessments documented in a Report on Compliance?
-
Does PCI DSS define which versions of TLS must be used?
-
Do ASV scans in SAQ A apply to merchants with webpages that redirect to TPSPs or include TPSPs’ embedded iframes?
-
Is sampling allowed in PCI DSS v4.x?