Frequently Asked Question
Are Approved Scanning Vendors and Qualified Security Assessors considered third-party service providers for PCI DSS Requirements 12.8 and 12.9?
No, Approved Scanning Vendors (ASVs) and Qualified Security Assessors (QSAs) are not considered third-party service providers (TPSPs) for purposes of PCI DSS Requirements 12.8 and 12.9, if an ASV or QSA company’s only service is performing ASV scans or conducting PCI DSS assessments, respectively. Where ASV or QSA companies provide other services, they may be considered a TPSP for those services.
ASV and QSA companies are qualified by the PCI Security Standards Council’s (PCI SSC) to offer ASV and QSA related services. The PCI SSC qualification processes ensure that:
- ASV companies and their ASV tools meet specific criteria necessary to perform external vulnerability scans for PCI DSS Requirement 11.3.2.
- QSA companies and individual QSAs meet specific criteria necessary to perform PCI DSS assessments.
These companies have a direct relationship with PCI SSC through the ASV and QSA programs and are subject to PCI SSC’s quality programs to remain in good standing and be included on PCI SSC’s lists of qualified professionals.
Regardless of the relationship these companies have with PCI SSC, entities should follow their internal third-party due diligence processes when engaging with an ASV or QSA company.
Related
-
Should entities with enterprise or internal service providers, used to provide internal services to other corporate entities, conduct separate PCI DSS assessments of these service providers or include them as part of each corporate entity’s PCI DSS assessment?
-
What is the impact if an entity uses a third-party service provider (TPSP) to meet a PCI DSS requirement(s), when that TPSP’s PCI DSS assessment completion date is close to a year ago, as documented in the TPSP’s Attestation of Compliance (AOC)?
Featured FAQ Articles
Featured
-
Do PCI DSS requirements for keyed cryptographic hashing apply to previously hashed PANs?
-
Is the PCI DSS Attestation of Compliance intended to be shared?
-
How does an entity report the results of a PCI DSS assessment for new requirements that are noted in PCI DSS as best practices until a future date?
-
Where do I direct questions about complying with PCI standards?
-
Can SAQ eligibility criteria be used as a guide for determining applicability of PCI DSS requirements for merchant assessments documented in a Report on Compliance?
Most Popular
-
Should entities with enterprise or internal service providers, used to provide internal services to other corporate entities, conduct separate PCI DSS assessments of these service providers or include them as part of each corporate entity’s PCI DSS assessment?
-
What is the impact if an entity uses a third-party service provider (TPSP) to meet a PCI DSS requirement(s), when that TPSP’s PCI DSS assessment completion date is close to a year ago, as documented in the TPSP’s Attestation of Compliance (AOC)?
-
Are Approved Scanning Vendors and Qualified Security Assessors considered third-party service providers for PCI DSS Requirements 12.8 and 12.9?
-
What are the expectations for entities when assigning risk rankings to vulnerabilities and resolving or addressing those vulnerabilities?
-
Is phishing-resistant authentication alone acceptable as multi-factor authentication for PCI DSS Requirements 8.4.1 and 8.4.3?
Most Recently Updated
-
Should entities with enterprise or internal service providers, used to provide internal services to other corporate entities, conduct separate PCI DSS assessments of these service providers or include them as part of each corporate entity’s PCI DSS assessment?
-
What is the Council's guidance on the use of SHA-1?
-
In what circumstances is multi-factor authentication required?
-
Is two-step authentication acceptable for PCI DSS Requirement 8.4?
-
How can hashing be used to protect Primary Account Numbers (PAN) and in what circumstances can hashed PANs be considered out of scope for PCI DSS?