Frequently Asked Question

Why is SAQ A-EP used for Direct Post while SAQ A is used for iFrame or URL redirect?
There is a distinct difference in terms of how payment data is accepted between Direct Post & iFrames/redirects, which is why there are different SAQs. In a Direct Post implementation, the merchant website produces some or all of the web page that is used to accept payment data, and then passes it directly to the third-party payment processor. In this implementation, the consumer (cardholder) never leaves the merchant website. Conversely, with a redirect or iFrame, the third-party payment processor produces the webpage that accepts payment data. The merchant website is not directly involved in the acceptance of payment data as this is directly accepted by the third-party payment processor. In these implementations, the consumer leaves the merchant website and goes to the payment processor for payment acceptance and processing.
This data flow is a key difference between the different methods, and is reflected in the eligibility criteria for SAQ A and SAQ A-EP as follows:
-
SAQ A: All elements of the payment page(s) delivered to the consumer's browser originate only and directly from a PCI DSS validated third-party service provider(s)
- SAQ A-EP: Each element of the payment page(s) delivered to the consumer's browser originates from either the merchant's website or a PCI DSS compliant service provider(s)
Related
-
What are the expectations for entities when assigning risk rankings to vulnerabilities and resolving or addressing those vulnerabilities?
-
Is phishing-resistant authentication alone acceptable as multi-factor authentication for PCI DSS Requirements 8.4.1 and 8.4.3?
-
Are passkeys synced across devices, implemented according to the FIDO2 requirements, acceptable for use as phishing-resistant authentication to meet PCI DSS Requirement 8.4.2?
Featured FAQ Articles
Featured
-
Do PCI DSS requirements for keyed cryptographic hashing apply to previously hashed PANs?
-
Is the PCI DSS Attestation of Compliance intended to be shared?
-
How does an entity report the results of a PCI DSS assessment for new requirements that are noted in PCI DSS as best practices until a future date?
-
Where do I direct questions about complying with PCI standards?
-
Can SAQ eligibility criteria be used as a guide for determining applicability of PCI DSS requirements for merchant assessments documented in a Report on Compliance?
Most Popular
-
What are the expectations for entities when assigning risk rankings to vulnerabilities and resolving or addressing those vulnerabilities?
-
Is phishing-resistant authentication alone acceptable as multi-factor authentication for PCI DSS Requirements 8.4.1 and 8.4.3?
-
Are passkeys synced across devices, implemented according to the FIDO2 requirements, acceptable for use as phishing-resistant authentication to meet PCI DSS Requirement 8.4.2?
-
How should PCI DSS v4.x requirements noted as superseded by another requirement be reported after 31 March 2025?
-
Are providers of third-party scripts for e-commerce environments considered third-party service providers for PCI DSS Requirements 12.8 and 12.9?
Most Recently Updated
-
How often must service providers test penetration testing segmentation controls under PCI DSS?
-
Are merchants allowed to request card-verification codes/values from cardholders?
-
What is the maximum period of time that cardholder data can be stored?
-
How can an entity ensure that hashed and truncated versions cannot be correlated?
-
Are point-of-interaction devices required to be physically secured (for example, with a cable or tether) to prevent removal or substitution to meet PCI DSS Requirement 9.5?