Frequently Asked Question
What is meant by "significant change" in PCI DSS?
There are several PCI DSS requirements that specify performance upon a significant change in an entity's environment. While what constitutes a significant change is highly dependent on the configuration of a given environment, each of the following activities are included under "Significant Change" in the "Description of Timeframes Used in PCI DSS Requirements" section in PCI DSS v4.0:
-
New hardware, software, or networking equipment added to the CDE.
-
Any replacement or major upgrades of hardware and software in the CDE.
-
Any changes in the flow or storage of account data.
-
Any changes to the boundary of the CDE and/or to the scope of the PCI DSS assessment.
-
Any changes to the underlying supporting infrastructure of the CDE (including, but not limited to, changes to directory services, time servers, logging, and monitoring).
-
Any changes to third party vendors/service providers (or services provided) that support the CDE or meet PCI DSS requirements on behalf of the entity.
Each of these activities, at a minimum, have potential impacts on the security of an entity's cardholder data environment (CDE), and must be considered and evaluated to determine whether a change is significant for that entity and in the context of related PCI DSS requirements.
Related
-
Should entities with enterprise or internal service providers, used to provide internal services to other corporate entities, conduct separate PCI DSS assessments of these service providers or include them as part of each corporate entity’s PCI DSS assessment?
-
What is the impact if an entity uses a third-party service provider (TPSP) to meet a PCI DSS requirement(s), when that TPSP’s PCI DSS assessment completion date is close to a year ago, as documented in the TPSP’s Attestation of Compliance (AOC)?
-
Are Approved Scanning Vendors and Qualified Security Assessors considered third-party service providers for PCI DSS Requirements 12.8 and 12.9?
Featured FAQ Articles
Featured
-
Do PCI DSS requirements for keyed cryptographic hashing apply to previously hashed PANs?
-
Is the PCI DSS Attestation of Compliance intended to be shared?
-
How does an entity report the results of a PCI DSS assessment for new requirements that are noted in PCI DSS as best practices until a future date?
-
Where do I direct questions about complying with PCI standards?
-
Can SAQ eligibility criteria be used as a guide for determining applicability of PCI DSS requirements for merchant assessments documented in a Report on Compliance?
Most Popular
-
Should entities with enterprise or internal service providers, used to provide internal services to other corporate entities, conduct separate PCI DSS assessments of these service providers or include them as part of each corporate entity’s PCI DSS assessment?
-
What is the impact if an entity uses a third-party service provider (TPSP) to meet a PCI DSS requirement(s), when that TPSP’s PCI DSS assessment completion date is close to a year ago, as documented in the TPSP’s Attestation of Compliance (AOC)?
-
Are Approved Scanning Vendors and Qualified Security Assessors considered third-party service providers for PCI DSS Requirements 12.8 and 12.9?
-
What are the expectations for entities when assigning risk rankings to vulnerabilities and resolving or addressing those vulnerabilities?
-
Is phishing-resistant authentication alone acceptable as multi-factor authentication for PCI DSS Requirements 8.4.1 and 8.4.3?
Most Recently Updated
-
Should entities with enterprise or internal service providers, used to provide internal services to other corporate entities, conduct separate PCI DSS assessments of these service providers or include them as part of each corporate entity’s PCI DSS assessment?
-
What is the Council's guidance on the use of SHA-1?
-
In what circumstances is multi-factor authentication required?
-
Is two-step authentication acceptable for PCI DSS Requirement 8.4?
-
How can hashing be used to protect Primary Account Numbers (PAN) and in what circumstances can hashed PANs be considered out of scope for PCI DSS?