Frequently Asked Question
What date should be used for "Date of Report" in the ROC?
The "Date of Report" indicates the completion date of the ROC, and therefore must be no earlier than the date on which the QSA completed collection and validation of corresponding evidence to support the QSA's findings documented in the ROC.
Further, the ROC should not be considered complete until all reporting within the ROC is finalized, including completion of all internal quality assurance activities.
Note: Per the QSA Program Guide, the dates of the ROC and AOC cannot predate completion of the PCI DSS Assessment, and the date of the AOC cannot predate the corresponding ROC. As a matter of accuracy, the date of the ROC and AOC should not be in the future. See also Can an Attestation of Compliance (AOC) be provided to an assessed entity before the Report on Compliance (ROC) is finalized?
Further, the ROC should not be considered complete until all reporting within the ROC is finalized, including completion of all internal quality assurance activities.
Note: Per the QSA Program Guide, the dates of the ROC and AOC cannot predate completion of the PCI DSS Assessment, and the date of the AOC cannot predate the corresponding ROC. As a matter of accuracy, the date of the ROC and AOC should not be in the future. See also Can an Attestation of Compliance (AOC) be provided to an assessed entity before the Report on Compliance (ROC) is finalized?
Last updated: July 2019
Article Number: 1458
Related
-
What evidence is a TPSP expected to provide to customers to demonstrate PCI DSS compliance?
-
Does PCI SSC consider guidance from other standards organizations when making updates to PCI standards?
-
If an organization provides software or functionality that runs on a consumer's device (for example, smartphones, tablets, or laptops) and is used to accept payment account data, can the organization store card verification codes for those consumers?
Featured FAQ Articles
Featured
-
Do PCI DSS requirements for keyed cryptographic hashing apply to previously hashed PANs?
-
Is the PCI DSS Attestation of Compliance intended to be shared?
-
How does an entity report the results of a PCI DSS assessment for new requirements that are noted in PCI DSS as best practices until a future date?
-
Where do I direct questions about complying with PCI standards?
-
Can SAQ eligibility criteria be used for determining applicability of PCI DSS requirements for assessments documented in a Report on Compliance?
Most Popular
-
What evidence is a TPSP expected to provide to customers to demonstrate PCI DSS compliance?
-
Does PCI SSC consider guidance from other standards organizations when making updates to PCI standards?
-
If an organization provides software or functionality that runs on a consumer's device (for example, smartphones, tablets, or laptops) and is used to accept payment account data, can the organization store card verification codes for those consumers?
-
Do PCI DSS requirements for keyed cryptographic hashing apply to previously hashed PANs?
-
Can a compensating control be used for requirements with a periodic or defined frequency, where an entity did not perform the activity within the required timeframe?
Most Recently Updated
-
Are Mobile Payments on COTS (MPoC) solutions, Software-based PIN Entry on COTS (SPoC)™ solutions, or Contactless Payments on COTS (CPoC™) solutions eligible for a P2PE Solution approval?
-
How can an entity meet PCI DSS requirements for PAN masking and truncation if it has migrated to 8-digit BINs?
-
Can a compensating control be used for requirements with a periodic or defined frequency, where an entity did not perform the activity within the required timeframe?
-
How does encrypted cardholder data impact PCI DSS scope for third-party service providers?
-
Does PCI SSC provide a list of PCI DSS-compliant third-party service providers?