Frequently Asked Question

What are the security considerations for TLS 1.3?
Transport Layer Security (TLS) is a protocol that provides security over networks and is widely used for internet communications and online transactions. TLS version 1.3 introduces protocol changes that may improve security and performance while removing complexities and streamlining the protocol stack. These changes, however, also introduce new considerations for organizations using TLS for security controls.
Organizations implementing TLS 1.3 will need to ensure their implementation is properly configured. Factors to consider when evaluating a TLS implementation include the services and options enabled, the cryptographic algorithms supported, and the strength of the cryptographic keys used.
Organizations should also be aware that the features of TLS 1.3 could affect the functionality for some types of security solutions, such as those that rely on decryption to inspect the packets before they reach the endpoint. For example, organizations using web application firewalls and intrusion detection/prevention systems may find that these systems no longer function as expected, as they may not be able to analyze the encrypted TLS 1.3 connections. This may require changes in the way organizations satisfy certain PCI DSS requirements.
Additionally, devices that do not yet support TLS 1.3 may react differently when presented with TLS 1.3 encrypted traffic. The result could be that traffic is allowed to pass through without inspection, potentially leaving malicious payloads or activities undetected. Other devices could fallback to an earlier or insecure version of the protocol, resulting in data having a lower level of protection than intended. These issues may result in organizations needing to reconfigure or adapt their systems so that they continue to perform as expected.
As with all new technologies, organizations should evaluate and review the possible implications that TLS 1.3 may have on their environment. Organizations are encouraged to contact their security solution vendors to determine any potential impact and whether alternative configurations or other workarounds are recommended.
PCI SSC continues to monitor the evolution of security protocols and their impact on security solutions for the payment industry, and will keep stakeholders informed as updates become available.
Organizations implementing TLS 1.3 will need to ensure their implementation is properly configured. Factors to consider when evaluating a TLS implementation include the services and options enabled, the cryptographic algorithms supported, and the strength of the cryptographic keys used.
Organizations should also be aware that the features of TLS 1.3 could affect the functionality for some types of security solutions, such as those that rely on decryption to inspect the packets before they reach the endpoint. For example, organizations using web application firewalls and intrusion detection/prevention systems may find that these systems no longer function as expected, as they may not be able to analyze the encrypted TLS 1.3 connections. This may require changes in the way organizations satisfy certain PCI DSS requirements.
Additionally, devices that do not yet support TLS 1.3 may react differently when presented with TLS 1.3 encrypted traffic. The result could be that traffic is allowed to pass through without inspection, potentially leaving malicious payloads or activities undetected. Other devices could fallback to an earlier or insecure version of the protocol, resulting in data having a lower level of protection than intended. These issues may result in organizations needing to reconfigure or adapt their systems so that they continue to perform as expected.
As with all new technologies, organizations should evaluate and review the possible implications that TLS 1.3 may have on their environment. Organizations are encouraged to contact their security solution vendors to determine any potential impact and whether alternative configurations or other workarounds are recommended.
PCI SSC continues to monitor the evolution of security protocols and their impact on security solutions for the payment industry, and will keep stakeholders informed as updates become available.
January 2019
Article Number: 1461
Related
-
What are the expectations for entities when assigning risk rankings to vulnerabilities and resolving or addressing those vulnerabilities?
-
Is phishing-resistant authentication alone acceptable as multi-factor authentication for PCI DSS Requirements 8.4.1 and 8.4.3?
-
Are passkeys synced across devices, implemented according to the FIDO2 requirements, acceptable for use as phishing-resistant authentication to meet PCI DSS Requirement 8.4.2?
Featured FAQ Articles
Featured
-
Do PCI DSS requirements for keyed cryptographic hashing apply to previously hashed PANs?
-
Is the PCI DSS Attestation of Compliance intended to be shared?
-
How does an entity report the results of a PCI DSS assessment for new requirements that are noted in PCI DSS as best practices until a future date?
-
Where do I direct questions about complying with PCI standards?
-
Can SAQ eligibility criteria be used as a guide for determining applicability of PCI DSS requirements for merchant assessments documented in a Report on Compliance?
Most Popular
-
What are the expectations for entities when assigning risk rankings to vulnerabilities and resolving or addressing those vulnerabilities?
-
Is phishing-resistant authentication alone acceptable as multi-factor authentication for PCI DSS Requirements 8.4.1 and 8.4.3?
-
Are passkeys synced across devices, implemented according to the FIDO2 requirements, acceptable for use as phishing-resistant authentication to meet PCI DSS Requirement 8.4.2?
-
How should PCI DSS v4.x requirements noted as superseded by another requirement be reported after 31 March 2025?
-
Are providers of third-party scripts for e-commerce environments considered third-party service providers for PCI DSS Requirements 12.8 and 12.9?
Most Recently Updated
-
How often must service providers test penetration testing segmentation controls under PCI DSS?
-
Are merchants allowed to request card-verification codes/values from cardholders?
-
What is the maximum period of time that cardholder data can be stored?
-
How can an entity ensure that hashed and truncated versions cannot be correlated?
-
Are point-of-interaction devices required to be physically secured (for example, with a cable or tether) to prevent removal or substitution to meet PCI DSS Requirement 9.5?