Frequently Asked Question
Is it acceptable to make minor changes to a PA-DSS validated application and retain the existing version number?
All changes to the software of a validated PA-DSS application must result in a new version number, even if there is no impact on PA-DSS requirements. This is necessary to ensure all parties involved can clearly determine whether a particular version of an application is PA-DSS validated. Note that an application may have multiple versions listed as PA-DSS validated, but only those specific versions listed on the PCI SSC website are considered PA-DSS validated.
If an Administrative Change (as defined in the PA-DSS Program Guide) is made to an application such that there is no change to the software itself (for example, corporate entity name change), then the version number of the application may remain unchanged at the application vendor's discretion. The application vendor should follow the process set out in the PA-DSS Program Guide in order for the List of Validated Payment Applications to be updated.
If an Administrative Change (as defined in the PA-DSS Program Guide) is made to an application such that there is no change to the software itself (for example, corporate entity name change), then the version number of the application may remain unchanged at the application vendor's discretion. The application vendor should follow the process set out in the PA-DSS Program Guide in order for the List of Validated Payment Applications to be updated.
November 2012
Article Number: 1182
Related
-
When should an entity implement PCI DSS requirements noted as best practices until a future date?
-
For PCI DSS, can multi-factor authentication (MFA) implementations indicate the success of a factor prior to presentation of subsequent factors?
-
What is the completion date for PCI DSS assessments documented in a Report on Compliance and its related Attestations of Compliance?
Featured FAQ Articles
Featured
-
Do PCI DSS requirements for keyed cryptographic hashing apply to previously hashed PANs?
-
Is the PCI DSS Attestation of Compliance intended to be shared?
-
How does an entity report the results of a PCI DSS assessment for new requirements that are noted in PCI DSS as best practices until a future date?
-
Where do I direct questions about complying with PCI standards?
-
Can SAQ eligibility criteria be used for determining applicability of PCI DSS requirements for assessments documented in a Report on Compliance?
Most Popular
-
When should an entity implement PCI DSS requirements noted as best practices until a future date?
-
For PCI DSS, can multi-factor authentication (MFA) implementations indicate the success of a factor prior to presentation of subsequent factors?
-
What is the completion date for PCI DSS assessments documented in a Report on Compliance and its related Attestations of Compliance?
-
What is the completion date for PCI DSS assessments documented in a Self-Assessment Questionnaire and its related Attestations of Compliance?
-
How does PCI DSS Requirement 6.4.3 apply to 3DS scripts called from a merchant check-out page as part of 3DS processing?
Most Recently Updated
-
When should an entity implement PCI DSS requirements noted as best practices until a future date?
-
What is meant by "At-Risk Timeframe" and at risk referenced in the Final PFI Report?
-
Does PCI DSS Requirement 8.2.2 allow users to share authentication credentials?
-
For PCI DSS, can multi-factor authentication (MFA) implementations indicate the success of a factor prior to presentation of subsequent factors?
-
What is the completion date for PCI DSS assessments documented in a Report on Compliance and its related Attestations of Compliance?