Frequently Asked Question
For P2PE solutions, can you use PCI approved POI devices with SRED, where the PTS listing indicates "Non CTLS"?
This is a "normative" FAQ - It is considered to be part of the P2PE requirements and shall be considered during a P2PE assessment in the same light as the published P2PE standard.
(a) Was validated under PTS POI v3.0, including the SRED module, prior to release of criteria for evaluating contactless (CTLS) interfaces in PTS POI v3.1, and (b) Successfully completes required annual supplemental contactless evaluations ('SCE') by the originating PTS lab, validating compliance with a subset of PTS POI requirements relating to vulnerability to common logical security attacks. PCI PTS-approved POI devices meeting the requirements of item 2(a) above and identified as "Non-CTLS" on the listing of PTS Approved Devices are considered to be "Permitted Non-CTLS Devices." Permitted Non-CTLS Devices that meet (and continue to meet) Requirement 2(b) above are acceptable for use in P2PE solutions and are listed in the table below. Once these devices are evaluated as part of a P2PE Solution, they will be included on the list of Validated P2PE Solutions with an explanatory note. A Permitted Non-CTLS Device that no longer meets Requirement 2(b) per the annual SCE may be delisted from the list of Validated P2PE Solutions if the contactless interface cannot be disabled. |
IMPORTANT NOTES:
|
The following are the only Permitted Non-CTLS Devices currently allowed in
P2PE Solutions:
Model | Firmware Number noted as 'SRED (Non-CTLS)' | PTS Approval | SCE Expiry Date |
Ingenico IWL220, IWL250 | 820528v02.xx | 4-20181 | December 31, 2016 |
Ingenico iSMP | 820528V02.xx | 4-20183 | December 31, 2016 |
Ingenico iCT220, iCT250 | 820528V02.xx | 4-20196 | November 30, 2016 |
Ingenico iPP310, iPP320, iPP350 | 820528V02.xx | 4-20184 | October 31, 2016 |
Related
-
What evidence is a TPSP expected to provide to customers to demonstrate PCI DSS compliance?
-
Does PCI SSC consider guidance from other standards organizations when making updates to PCI standards?
-
If an organization provides software or functionality that runs on a consumer's device (for example, smartphones, tablets, or laptops) and is used to accept payment account data, can the organization store card verification codes for those consumers?
Featured FAQ Articles
Featured
-
Do PCI DSS requirements for keyed cryptographic hashing apply to previously hashed PANs?
-
Is the PCI DSS Attestation of Compliance intended to be shared?
-
How does an entity report the results of a PCI DSS assessment for new requirements that are noted in PCI DSS as best practices until a future date?
-
Where do I direct questions about complying with PCI standards?
-
Can SAQ eligibility criteria be used for determining applicability of PCI DSS requirements for assessments documented in a Report on Compliance?
Most Popular
-
What evidence is a TPSP expected to provide to customers to demonstrate PCI DSS compliance?
-
Does PCI SSC consider guidance from other standards organizations when making updates to PCI standards?
-
If an organization provides software or functionality that runs on a consumer's device (for example, smartphones, tablets, or laptops) and is used to accept payment account data, can the organization store card verification codes for those consumers?
-
Do PCI DSS requirements for keyed cryptographic hashing apply to previously hashed PANs?
-
Can a compensating control be used for requirements with a periodic or defined frequency, where an entity did not perform the activity within the required timeframe?
Most Recently Updated
-
Where can I find the current version of PCI DSS?
-
Why are there multiple PCI DSS Self-assessment Questionnaires (SAQs)?
-
What is a PCI DSS Self-Assessment Questionnaire?
-
Are Mobile Payments on COTS (MPoC) solutions, Software-based PIN Entry on COTS (SPoC)™ solutions, or Contactless Payments on COTS (CPoC™) solutions eligible for a P2PE Solution approval?
-
How can an entity meet PCI DSS requirements for PAN masking and truncation if it has migrated to 8-digit BINs?