Frequently Asked Question
Can the "Compliant but with Legal exception" option in the AOC be used to identify where a testing procedure could not be performed due to a legal constraint?
No. The "Compliant but with Legal exception" option in Part 3 of an Attestation of Compliance (AOC) allows an entity to document that they could not implement one or more requirements because doing so would contravene a local or regional law or regulation. In such circumstances, the requirements that cannot be met must be marked as "Not in Place" in the accompanying ROC (Report on Compliance) or SAQ (Self-Assessment Questionnaire), as applicable. Use of the "Compliant but with Legal exception" option also requires additional review from the acquirer or payment brand to whom compliance is being reported.
Where the assessor is unable to complete testing of a requirement because of a legal constraint-for example, due to government enforced travel restrictions, local or regional lockdowns, or other factors impacting the assessor's ability to gain access or complete a testing activity-the affected requirements must be marked as 'Not Tested'. Because the assessor was unable to determine whether the requirement has been met, Part 3 of the AOC must be marked as 'Non-Compliant.'
In situations where testing procedures cannot be completed, assessors are encouraged to document in the report why the requirement could not be tested, and entities encouraged to consult with their acquirer and/or payment brand to understand expectations regarding partial or incomplete assessments.
Related
-
What evidence is a TPSP expected to provide to customers to demonstrate PCI DSS compliance?
-
Does PCI SSC consider guidance from other standards organizations when making updates to PCI standards?
-
If an organization provides software or functionality that runs on a consumer's device (for example, smartphones, tablets, or laptops) and is used to accept payment account data, can the organization store card verification codes for those consumers?
Featured FAQ Articles
Featured
-
Do PCI DSS requirements for keyed cryptographic hashing apply to previously hashed PANs?
-
Is the PCI DSS Attestation of Compliance intended to be shared?
-
How does an entity report the results of a PCI DSS assessment for new requirements that are noted in PCI DSS as best practices until a future date?
-
Where do I direct questions about complying with PCI standards?
-
Can SAQ eligibility criteria be used for determining applicability of PCI DSS requirements for assessments documented in a Report on Compliance?
Most Popular
-
What evidence is a TPSP expected to provide to customers to demonstrate PCI DSS compliance?
-
Does PCI SSC consider guidance from other standards organizations when making updates to PCI standards?
-
If an organization provides software or functionality that runs on a consumer's device (for example, smartphones, tablets, or laptops) and is used to accept payment account data, can the organization store card verification codes for those consumers?
-
Do PCI DSS requirements for keyed cryptographic hashing apply to previously hashed PANs?
-
Can a compensating control be used for requirements with a periodic or defined frequency, where an entity did not perform the activity within the required timeframe?
Most Recently Updated
-
Where can I find the current version of PCI DSS?
-
Why are there multiple PCI DSS Self-assessment Questionnaires (SAQs)?
-
What is a PCI DSS Self-Assessment Questionnaire?
-
Are Mobile Payments on COTS (MPoC) solutions, Software-based PIN Entry on COTS (SPoC)™ solutions, or Contactless Payments on COTS (CPoC™) solutions eligible for a P2PE Solution approval?
-
How can an entity meet PCI DSS requirements for PAN masking and truncation if it has migrated to 8-digit BINs?